On Wed, Mar 16, 2016 at 08:34:46PM +0200, Efraim Flashner wrote: > On Wed, 16 Mar 2016 12:09:06 +0100 > Tobias Geerinckx-Rice <tobias.geerinckx.r...@gmail.com> wrote: > > > On 16/03/2016, Leo Famulari <l...@famulari.name> wrote: > > [...] > > > > (Disclaimer of sorts: I wrote that package as well, a long time ago. > > For the same machine I'm hoping to migrate to Guix soon.) > > > > Yes please! Since the main purpose of this package is peace of mind, I > > consider it worth patching. > > > > In my very scientific tests of pretend-dropping my laptop and watching > > the HDD LED, the default seemed needlessly short. I've seen expensive > > things bounce about for much longer... > > > > Should I add a separate .patch file for this, or just do it inline like Nix? > > > > Kind regards, > > > > T G-R > > > > I personally prefer inline as long as it isn't too big/hard. In my > unscientific understanding of it, it allows people who don't use substitutes > to be more self-reliant.
I also think it's much more likely to be read later on, which is a positive thing. Plus it's Scheme so you could do more things with the data. > > -- > Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> אפרים פלשנר > GPG key = A28B F40C 3E55 1372 662D 14F7 41AA E7DC CA3D 8351 > Confidentiality cannot be guaranteed on emails sent or received unencrypted