Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis:
> Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> writes:
[...]
>> I’ll investigate this. It’s odd that “-lgfortran” cannot be found only
>> because we deleted useless wrappers.
>
> I found that for randomjungle the native inputs must now also include
>
> ("gfortran" ,gfortran "lib")
>
> in *addition* to the usual
>
> ("gfortran" ,gfortran)
>
> I can prepare a patch for the three broken packages, but I wonder why
> this is necessary. “gfortran” alone does not install “libgfortran.so”,
> only the “lib” output does.
For GCC we hack the “lib” spec (as show by ‘gcc -dumpspecs’) so that it
has an extra -L for libgcc_s (search for ‘GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC’ in
gcc.scm).
Should something similar be done here?
Ludo’.
