On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:49:17PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > On Sun, Mar 06, 2016 at 01:58:00PM +0100, Andreas Enge wrote: > > On Sat, Mar 05, 2016 at 05:32:07PM -0500, Leo Famulari wrote: > > > I understood that message as "Python 3 could work, but we will have to > > > do something special to help it link with libpython3.3m". > > > > > > When it built successfully and passed its test suite, I figured it was > > > okay. > > > > > > Andreas, do you remember what this comment is describing? > > > > No idea. I understood the message like you :-) > > So, in the past it did not build successfully? If so, I'd say it works > now.
If there are no objections, I'd like to apply these patches in the next day or so. > > > > > Andreas > > >
