Mark H Weaver (2016-03-13 07:27 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes: > >> Ludovic Courtès (2016-03-11 17:50 +0300) wrote: >> >>> Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> skribis: >>> >>>> On Fri, 11 Mar 2016 13:08:17 +0300 >>>> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> wrote: >>>> >>>>> I was going to commit several updates including font-dejavu. Happily, >>>>> with: >>>>> >>>>> guix refresh -l font-dejavu >>>>> >>>>> I found that many things would be rebuilt (including some big ones like >>>>> abiword, libreoffice, gimp, gnome). This happens because 'font-dejavu' >>>>> is an input of 'cups-filters' which is an input of 'cups' which is an >>>>> input for several things including 'gtk+'. >>>>> >>>>> So my question is: should this update go to master? >>>> >>>> Some of these I push to core-updates. Rebuilding check means rebuilding 188 >>>> packages so I pushed it to core-updates. Currently hydra is building out >>>> security updates to take out some of the grafts so not "distracting" hydra >>>> with large rebuilds is good(tm). >>> >>> +1 >> >> Sorry, I didn't get it. Should this update be pushed to core-updates? >> But not now? > > I think you should push the update to core-updates at your earliest > convenience :)
Thanks, that's what I thought. Pushed to core-updates. -- Alex
