Leo Famulari writes: > On Fri, Feb 19, 2016 at 06:30:35PM -0800, Christopher Allan Webber wrote: >> New version. >> > >> From 03f8891a2635b6d8f349af0809547e75b9c0e112 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >> From: Christopher Allan Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> >> Date: Sat, 13 Feb 2016 18:04:18 -0800 >> Subject: [PATCH 02/18] gnu: Add python2-apipkg. >> >> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python2-apipkg): New variable. >> --- >> gnu/packages/python.scm | 10 +++++++++- >> 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) >> >> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm >> index 561f64a..ef91754 100644 >> --- a/gnu/packages/python.scm >> +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm >> @@ -6852,7 +6852,15 @@ applications.") >> package and greatly reduce the number of imports for your users. It is a >> small >> pure Python module that works on virtually all Python versions.") >> (home-page "https://bitbucket.org/hpk42/apipkg";) >> - (license license:expat))) >> + (license license:expat) >> + (properties `((python2-variant . ,(delay python2-apipkg)))))) >> + >> +(define-public python2-apipkg >> + (package >> + (inherit (package-with-python2 >> + (strip-python2-variant python-apipkg))) >> + (native-inputs >> + `(("python2-setuptools" ,python2-setuptools))))) > > I noticed that python-apipkg uses unzip as a native-input, so this > variant would lose unzip. I tested it python-apipkg and it doesn't > *actually* need unzip to build... not sure why I thought it did. Would > you mind removing unzip from python-apipkg?
Sure, though I think that's a separate commit. I've verified it works locally, and will push with the wip-mediagoblin changes.
