Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > Hello, > > Christopher Allan Webber writes: > >> Alex Sassmannshausen writes: > > [...] > >> >> I tried building and testing it: >> >> Starting download of >> /gnu/store/gq2zz95zmmsjkpn7lbwfbna8m4hr56r7-guile-config-0.1.tar.gz >> From http://alex.pompo.co/software/guile-config-0.1.tar.gz... >> guile-config-0.1.tar.gz 332KiB 100KiB/s 00:03 [####################] >> 100.0% >> output path >> `/gnu/store/gq2zz95zmmsjkpn7lbwfbna8m4hr56r7-guile-config-0.1.tar.gz' should >> have sha256 hash `1yk4xmwp4rl9ral02igppfh9dh4l97k2kmgpkqhy3znjir004v8z', >> instead has `0fcj2d91z7nhm9k79zkc826l8i06khqvp3d641wik9s3hv6qjya2' >> >> So I guess unless I'm being MITM'ed or some other error (I verified >> that's the hash I'm seeing with "guix hash" after a wget), it looks like >> that hash is wrong? >> >> - Chris > > Thanks for testing. The hash was indeed wrong — which might be > reassuring to you ;-) > > I made some last minute changes yesterday and rolled a new release, > without bumping the version number, which of course changed the hash of > the tarball. I forgot to update the Guix patch. Sorry about that! > > I have updated the hash and added a copyright line (thanks for the > reminder Efraim!), please find an updated patch attached. > > Cheers for the reviews and tests, > > Alex
It looks good! I've merged and pushed.
