On Sat, Feb 06, 2016 at 12:45:39PM -0800, Steve Sprang wrote:
> It looks like downloading the tarball from erlang.org works now.
> Here's an improved patch.
I wonder, do you happen to have any Erlang programs packaged that I can
test this with? Or, would they require the creation of a full
erlang-build-system?
Otherwise, the patch LGTM with a couple minor stylistic changes.
> From 0a1a045ef67e5e70d003c230c72b78a13e38b69b Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> From: Steve Sprang <s...@stevesprang.com>
> Date: Sat, 6 Feb 2016 12:40:53 -0800
> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add erlang.
>
> * gnu/packages/erlang.scm: New file.
> * gnu-system.am (GNU_SYSTEM_MODULES): Add it.
Awesome, there is some Erlang software I'd like to package :) Thanks for
working on this.
> + (arguments
> + `(#:phases
> + (modify-phases %standard-phases
> + (add-after
> + 'patch-source-shebangs 'patch-source-env
I would put these phase names on the same line as 'add-after' or
directly below the first character of 'add-after'
> + (lambda* _
> + (let ((escripts
> + (append
> + (find-files "." "\\.escript")
> + (find-files "lib/stdlib/test/escript_SUITE_data/")
> + '("erts/lib_src/utils/make_atomics_api"
> + "erts/preloaded/src/add_abstract_code"
> + "lib/diameter/bin/diameterc"
> + "lib/reltool/examples/display_args"
> + "lib/reltool/examples/mnesia_core_dump_viewer"
> + "lib/snmp/src/compile/snmpc.src"
> + "make/verify_runtime_dependencies"
> + "make/emd2exml.in"))))
> + (substitute* escripts
> + (("/usr/bin/env") (which "env"))))))
> + (add-before
> + 'configure 'set-erl-top
> + (lambda* _
> + (setenv "ERL_TOP" (getcwd)))))
I _think_ that 'lambda _' would be appropriate here. I need a real
Schemer to weigh in ;)
