On 2 February 2016 at 17:39, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > One minor point: > [...]
A good one. So, for (my) future reference: re-writing upstream's descriptions for Guix is no problem? Glad to hear that. T G-R
On 2 February 2016 at 17:39, Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> wrote: > One minor point: > [...]
A good one. So, for (my) future reference: re-writing upstream's descriptions for Guix is no problem? Glad to hear that. T G-R