Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès (2016-01-23 20:18 +0300) wrote: > >> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> +(define license-name->license >> >> I just realized that I’d rather call it ‘lookup-license’ for >> consistency, because it’s not a conversion. > > OK, I'll rename it, and what about: > > (define (license-name->uri name) > (and=> (license-name->license name) > license-uri)) > > Should it be called ‘lookup-license-uri’ maybe?
Sounds good. Ludo’.
