Hi! […]
>>> 1. slash, <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D19219#25> >>> >>> guile:1.8/doc >>> xterm-256-color:320 >>> emacs:24.5/out >>> >>> 2. underscore, <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D1921= >9#28> >>> >>> emacs_24.5:out >>> >>> 3. at, <http://debbugs.gnu.org/cgi/bugreport.cgi?bug=3D19219#31> >>> >>> guile@1.8 >>> guile@1.8:doc >>> >>> What do people think? >> My order of preference (highest preference first) is: 3., 1., 2. > > Me too. > ben The problem I see with 3. is that the mailing list archives will detect the package names (with versions, ie the whole strings like ‘guile@1.8’) as email addresses, and hide them, by replacing them with ‘address@hidden’. As an example, here’s the mail I replied to: https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2016-01/msg00343.html If it wasn’t for this problem, my order of preference would be 3-1-2 too. Thanks for the effort, by the way. :)
