l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> 宋文武 <iyzs...@openmailbox.org> skribis:
>
>> From 6c9ea521e88d36bd1ce990a561477ec0e2950017 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?=E5=AE=8B=E6=96=87=E6=AD=A6?= <iyzs...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Nov 2015 13:31:19 +0800
>> Subject: [PATCH] tk: Hardcode path to TK_LIBRARY.
>>
>> Fixes <http://bugs.gnu.org/20889>.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/patches/tk-find-library.patch: New patch.
>> * gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
>> * gnu/packages/tcl.scm (tk)[source]: Add patch.
>
> [...]
>
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/patches/tk-find-library.patch
>> @@ -0,0 +1,30 @@
>> +This patch hardcode where Tk found its script library during package
> ^^ ^^^^
> “This patch hard-codes the Tk library directory during package
> initialization.”
>
> OK with this change. Thanks for providing a quick fix! :-)
>
> Could you commit it in a new ‘tk-update’ branch?
Done.
>
> At the same time, I think we should move tkinter*.so to a separate
> output of the Python packages; I think it’s a matter of moving the .so
> to a separate output, literally. Would you like to give it a try?
I don't know much about python, so I'd like to leave it for others :-)
