On Thu, Oct 22, 2015 at 05:43:03PM +0200, Paul van der Walt wrote: > Right, i see what you mean. I agree that it'd probably be the right > thing to do. However, to expedite the merge of wip-haskell-… i propose > that i take the solution of ghc-x11 and apply it to the relevant > packages, and then look at fixing the haskell-build-system. At that > point we can simply remove the phases introduced to work around this > deficiency. > Do you think that's acceptable, or is it imperative* that we first solve > the problem in the build system? > I prefer the incremental approach (but i am not an objective outside > observer).
I think it sounds reasonable, and would save us from further iterations of 150 commits sent to the mailing list :-) Seriously, I am impressed by your git juggling. Andreas
