Efraim Flashner <efr...@flashner.co.il> writes: > * gnu/packages/ncdu.scm (ncdu): Update to 1.11. > --- > gnu/packages/ncdu.scm | 6 +++--- > 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm b/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm > index 6c3d617..0b3fc66 100644 > --- a/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm > +++ b/gnu/packages/ncdu.scm > @@ -27,14 +27,14 @@ > (define-public ncdu > (package > (name "ncdu") > - (version "1.10") > + (version "1.11") > (source (origin
> (method url-fetch) > (uri (string-append "http://dev.yorhel.nl/download/ncdu-"; > version ".tar.gz")) > (sha256 > (base32 > - "0rqc5wpqcbfqpcwxgh3jxwa0yw2py0hv0acpsf0a9g6v9144m6gm")))) > + "0yxv87hpal05p6nii6rlnai5a8958689l9vz020w4qvlwiragbnh")))) Not related to this update but guix lint report undesired tabulations on these lines. It's fine to silently untabify them with this commit. > (inputs > `(("ncurses" ,ncurses))) > (build-system gnu-build-system) > @@ -44,5 +44,5 @@ run on a remote server where you don't have an entire > graphical setup, but have > to do with a simple SSH connection. ncdu aims to be fast, simple and easy to > use, and should be able to run in any minimal POSIX-like environment with > ncurses installed.") > - (license (x11-style > "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v1.10";)) > + (license (x11-style > "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v1.11";)) Since it has high probability to change every next version, I will be in favor of this (license (x11-style (string-append "http://g.blicky.net/ncdu.git/plain/COPYING?id=v"; version))) Maybe there is something with doing that, what do others think? -- Mathieu Lirzin
