On Sun 30 Aug 2015 21:46, l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > The binary format for locales is dependent on the libc version. Over > the last few releases, it turned out to be compatible, but that of 2.22 > differs from that of 2.21 (a new element was added to locale categories, > according to ChangeLog.)
Does this amount to a binary-incompatible change to libc? I guess not if you make sure that if you had a statically linked binary, that you set LOCPATH appropriately.... What if we built bootstrap binaries to statically link their LOCPATH ? Is that even possible? Andy
