Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: >> Eric Dvorsak <e...@dvorsak.fr> skribis: >> >>> * gnu/packages/fonts/scm (font-ubuntu): New variable. > > That last "/" should have been a ".". Oh well.
Oops. my bad. >> I changed the license URL to >> http://font.ubuntu.com/ufl/ubuntu-font-licence-1.0.txt and applied it. >> Thank you! > > The patch labelled this license as 'non-copyleft', but I'm not sure > that's right. It includes this text: > > 4) The Font Software, modified or unmodified, in part or in whole, > must be distributed entirely under this licence, and must not be > distributed under any other licence. [...] > > So this ensures that additional restrictions cannot be added later, like > a copyleft license. Good point. > I'm not entirely sure it's a free software license as indicated by > 'fsf-free' either, Why? > but that's okay because fonts qualify as non-functional data. It > might be that we don't yet have anything in (guix licenses) that > applies here. Maybe we need another license-producing procedure for > non-functional works that satify the FSDG requirements? Right, that’s something we could do in this case. I’d be surprised if this one were not considered FSF-free though? Thank you, Ludo’.
