I see that only several packages uses 'gpl3' license. And I don't really understand the cases when it should be used instead of 'gpl3+'.
I looked at "aarddict" and "weechat". They have the same COPYING/LICENSE files as <http://www.gnu.org/licenses/gpl.txt>. So it should be gpl3+, right? Then I looked at "flexbar". The only license-related mention in the source code is "(GPLv3)" in the commentary of "src/Flexbar.cpp": --8<---------------cut here---------------start------------->8--- Flexbar - flexible barcode and adapter removal Version 2.5 (GPLv3) --8<---------------cut here---------------end--------------->8--- Is it the case for 'gpl3'? Are there other cases to use 'gpl3'? -- Alex
