Mathieu Lirzin (2015-07-25 21:51 +0300) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> writes:
>
>> * emacs/guix-guile.el (guix-guile-current-module): New function.
>> * emacs/guix-devel.el: New file.
>> (guix-devel-use-modules, guix-devel-use-current-module): New functions.
>> * doc/emacs.texi (Emacs Development): New node. Document
>> 'guix-devel-use-current-module'.
>
> [...]
>
>> @@ -19,7 +19,8 @@ guix package}). Specifically, ``guix.el'' makes it easy
>> to:
>> * Usage: Emacs Usage. Using the interface.
>> * Configuration: Emacs Configuration. Configuring the interface.
>> * Prettify Mode: Emacs Prettify. Abbreviating @file{/gnu/store/@dots{}}
>> file names.
>> -* Completions: Emacs Completions. Completing @command{guix} shell
>> command.
>> +* Completions: Emacs Completions. Completing @command{guix} shell command.
>> +* Development: Emacs Development. Tools for Guix developers.
>> @end menu
>
> What do you think about integrating it in section "Contributing" instead?
Maybe, I don't have a preference here.
>> +And as always if you use a command often, it is a good idea to bind a
>> +key to it, for example like this:
>> +
>> +@example
>> +(with-eval-after-load 'scheme
>> + (define-key scheme-mode-map (kbd "C-c u")
>> + 'guix-devel-use-current-module))
>> +@end example
>
> I remember reading somewhere in the Emacs manual that "C-c <Letter>" is
> meant for user customization in the global key map (can't remember where
> ;)). So what suggesting "C-c C-u" which is a mode specific key binding?
I don't know whether there is such (or any other) suggestion anywhere.
But since that was just an example, not a recommendation (not even a
suggestion), I think it doesn't matter what key binding to use there.
Do you have any preference? What about "C-H-M-s-u"? :-)
--
Alex
