Ben Woodcroft <b.woodcr...@uq.edu.au> writes:
> On 27/06/15 22:33, Ben Woodcroft wrote:
>> To me this is problematic in two ways:
>> 1. It works on more than just genomes
>> 2. There is some contention in the field about the use of
>> "prokaryote", since this refers to a paraphyletic group - us humans
>> are more closely related to Archaea than Bacteria.
>> http://link.springer.com/referenceworkentry/10.1007/978-3-642-30194-0_114
>>
>> I figure it was just easier to sidestep the issue and put Archaea
>> and Bacteria.
> Perhaps I bored everyone, but is the patch a-ok now?
Looks good to me. Pushed, thanks!
Mark
