On Mon, Jun 15, 2015 at 05:16:06PM -0400, Mark H Weaver wrote: > The license you pasted is the original SSLeay License, whereas > <https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenSSL> says: > The license of OpenSSL is a conjunction of two licenses, one of them > being the license of SSLeay. You must follow both. [...] > > However, I see now that this is a bit confusing, and we made a mistake > in our 'license' field of our OpenSSL package. My casual reading of the > above text led me believe that the "OpenSSL License" is itself a > conjunction of the two licenses, but I see that > <http://directory.fsf.org/wiki/License:OpenSSL> does not include the > SSLeay license. > > So, I think we should add 'ssleay' to (guix licenses) and then add it to > the license field of 'openssl' along with a comment explaining that the > requirements of both (all?) licenses must be followed.
So this looks essentially like a bug in https://www.gnu.org/licenses/license-list.html#OpenSSL Would you like to report it (where?)? Then it would be good if the SSLeay license could be added as org/wiki/License:... before we add it to our license collection. Andreas
