Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > On Mon, May 18, 2015 at 11:53:45AM -0500, Luis Felipe López Acevedo wrote: >> Yes, I agree. The current design discriminates between two ranges of screens >> only. So a new range could be added to avoid the too-much-menu issue in >> wide-enough screens. > > That is yet another option. But I think that already now, you could enable > the traditional layout for intermediate screen sizes.
Yes, perhaps the following is enough? diff --git a/website/static/base/css/header-box.css b/website/static/base/css/header-box.css index dd1be4e..1355883 100644 --- a/website/static/base/css/header-box.css +++ b/website/static/base/css/header-box.css @@ -53,7 +53,7 @@ } -@media screen and (min-width: 1024px) { +@media screen and (min-width: 800px) { #header-box { height: 55px; } >> Ludovic suggested before that we could make the download items more compact, >> and I agree. For example, instead of having one download item per >> architecture, we would have one item for GuixSD and one item for Guix, each >> of them listing the available download alternatives (architecture, source, >> ...). For example: >> >> ------------------- >> GuixSD 0.8.2 >> >> USB installer of the Guix System Distribution. >> >> Download for x86_64 (get signature) >> Download for xi686 (get signature) >> Download for ... (get signature) > > That looks good. +1 Ludo’.