Andreas Enge <andr...@enge.fr> skribis: > On Sun, May 17, 2015 at 10:12:52PM +0200, Ludovic Courtès wrote:
[...] >> > + (license license:lgpl2.1))) >> LGPLv2.1-only? > > Well, I do not quite know where I took this from any more. The distribution > says: > "free (see LGPL for the GNU lesser general public license)" > and refers to LGPL.txt, which is not contained in the tarball, however. > The sourceforge website states > "License GNU Library or Lesser General Public License version 2.0 (LGPLv2)". > > By calling it "lesser" and not "library", they must mean 2.1 at least. > As there are no further specifications, I suppose this means 2.1+? I think so, yes. > I also realised I forgot to install the header files. There are quite a > few .h files after unpacking the tarball; I will try to track those that > are used by the demo program also included. Yeah, these may be useful. ;-) Thanks, Ludo’.
