Hello guix

This is a patch that allows acl to be built when hurd is targeted.

Is it okay to push to wip-hurd?

I have rebased wip-hurd on top of master locally and I have removed
some things from commit ea44aa1b33933328aa0b7b33f36dfcc90aaa8c74
that were no longer needed.
I will resend that patch for review before I push. All the others are the same.


Manolis
From c85bc49b864570b27af95260bb7e59d7db660b36 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
From: Manolis Ragkousis <manolis...@gmail.com>
Date: Sat, 25 Apr 2015 18:18:53 +0300
Subject: [PATCH] gnu: acl: Fix i686-gnu build.

* gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch: New file.
* gnu-system.am (dist_patch_DATA): Add it.
---
 gnu-system.am                                |  1 +
 gnu/packages/acl.scm                         |  4 +-
 gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch | 80 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
 3 files changed, 84 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
 create mode 100644 gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch

diff --git a/gnu-system.am b/gnu-system.am
index 3a10757..3b634a1 100644
--- a/gnu-system.am
+++ b/gnu-system.am
@@ -364,6 +364,7 @@ dist_patch_DATA =						\
   gnu/packages/patches/abiword-pass-no-undefined-to-linker.patch	\
   gnu/packages/patches/abiword-use-proper-png-api.patch		\
   gnu/packages/patches/abiword-wmf-version-lookup-fix.patch	\
+  gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch			\
   gnu/packages/patches/aegis-constness-error.patch         	\
   gnu/packages/patches/aegis-perl-tempdir1.patch           	\
   gnu/packages/patches/aegis-perl-tempdir2.patch           	\
diff --git a/gnu/packages/acl.scm b/gnu/packages/acl.scm
index af2fb62..f2e1bad 100644
--- a/gnu/packages/acl.scm
+++ b/gnu/packages/acl.scm
@@ -26,6 +26,7 @@
   #:use-module (gnu packages perl)
   #:use-module (guix packages)
   #:use-module (guix download)
+  #:use-module (gnu packages)
   #:use-module (guix build-system gnu))
 
 (define-public acl
@@ -39,7 +40,8 @@
                           version ".src.tar.gz"))
       (sha256
        (base32
-        "08qd9s3wfhv0ajswsylnfwr5h0d7j9d4rgip855nrh400nxp940p"))))
+        "08qd9s3wfhv0ajswsylnfwr5h0d7j9d4rgip855nrh400nxp940p"))
+      (patches (list (search-patch "acl-hurd-path-max.patch")))))
     (build-system gnu-build-system)
     (arguments
      `(#:tests? #f   ; FIXME: Investigate test suite failures
diff --git a/gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch b/gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..89cb3a3
--- /dev/null
+++ b/gnu/packages/patches/acl-hurd-path-max.patch
@@ -0,0 +1,80 @@
+http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=636512
+
+From: Svante Signell <s...@kth.se>
+Subject: acl: Fix FTBFS on hurd-i386
+Date: Wed, 03 Aug 2011 19:36:27 +0200
+
+Currently acl does not compile on hurd-i386. The problem is a PATH_MAX
+definition which is not supported on GNU/Hurd.
+
+Index: acl-2.2.52/setfacl/parse.c
+===================================================================
+--- acl-2.2.52/setfacl/parse.c
++++ acl-2.2.52/setfacl/parse.c
+@@ -419,7 +419,13 @@ read_acl_comments(
+ 	  bytes for "# file: ". Not a good solution but for now it is the
+ 	  best I can do without too much impact on the code. [tw]
+ 	*/
++
++#ifdef __GNU__
++	char *linebuf;
++	size_t dummy = 0;
++#else
+ 	char linebuf[(4*PATH_MAX)+9];
++#endif
+ 	char *cp;
+ 	char *p;
+ 	int comments_read = 0;
+@@ -449,9 +455,13 @@ read_acl_comments(
+ 		if (line)
+ 			(*line)++;
+ 
++#ifdef __GNU__
++		if (getline(&linebuf, &dummy, file) == -1)
++			break;
++#else
+ 		if (fgets(linebuf, sizeof(linebuf), file) == NULL)
+ 			break;
+-		
++#endif		
+ 		comments_read = 1;
+ 
+ 		p = strrchr(linebuf, '\0');
+@@ -473,7 +483,12 @@ read_acl_comments(
+ 					goto fail;
+ 				*path_p = (char*)malloc(strlen(cp)+1);
+ 				if (!*path_p)
++				  {
++#ifdef __GNU__
++				    free (linebuf);
++#endif
+ 					return -1;
++				  }
+ 				strcpy(*path_p, cp);
+ 			}
+ 		} else if (strncmp(cp, "owner:", 6) == 0) {
+@@ -522,13 +537,24 @@ read_acl_comments(
+ 		}
+ 	}
+ 	if (ferror(file))
++	  {
++#ifdef __GNU__
++	    free (linebuf);
++#endif
+ 		return -1;
++	  }
++#ifdef __GNU__
++	free (linebuf);
++#endif
+ 	return comments_read;
+ fail:
+ 	if (path_p && *path_p) {
+ 		free(*path_p);
+ 		*path_p = NULL;
+ 	}
++#ifdef __GNU__
++	free (linebuf);
++#endif
+ 	return -EINVAL;
+ }
+ 
-- 
2.3.6

Reply via email to