Rohan Prinja <rohan.pri...@gmail.com> skribis:

> Thank you, this helped. I've updated my proposal accordingly.

Great.

> Regarding DHCPv6: I read up on RFC 3315 and took notes. As you said, I feel
> that v6 should be kept as a bonus. The two protocols have a lot in common
> but v6 has enough extensions and additions to merit being a separate
> sub-project. When making the timeline, I'll make sure to structure the
> weekly deliverables in such a way as to leave a large enough buffer period
> to accomodate v6.

OK, sounds good!

Thank you,
Ludo’.

Reply via email to