El mar, 17-02-2015 a las 17:41 -0500, Mark H Weaver escribió: > Luis Felipe López Acevedo <felipe.lo...@openmailbox.org> writes:
[...] > > http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guixsd/C-grub-retouched-twist.png > > > > I think it looks better. But here is a D variant which includes the > > retouched twist of C and adds a drop shadow: > > > > http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guixsd/D-grub-retouched-drop-shadow.png > > > > This shadow is more subtle than the one used in the current GRUB image, > > but it may still flatten the logo because it is bevelled. > > > > I like C and D, but would go with C to avoid the problem you mention. > > > > What do you think? > > Thank you, both C and D are a great improvement. I would be happy with > either of them, but here's what I would suggest to combine the best of > both: starting with C, add a different kind of shadow from what you did > in D. > > In D, it looks as though you added a low-opacity black layer on top, > which results in highlights on the top edge and a shadow on the bottom. > Instead, I would try adding a larger, feathered (i.e. fuzzy-edged) > shadow in the *bottom* layer, closer to what you did in your recently > proposed orange-on-black SLiM theme in the right half of this image: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/pngMImBoTqdbR.png > (from https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2015-02/msg00395.html) > > though maybe not quite so large a shadow as that one. So, there would > be no highlights on top, but rather just a fuzzy shadow underneath. > What do you think? Would you like to try it? OK. Let's call that one variant E: http://sirgazil.bitbucket.org/static/temp/img/guixsd/E-grub-blurred-shadow.png I like C, D or E.
