Eric Bavier <bav...@member.fsf.org> writes:
> On Fri, 13 Feb 2015 00:48:05 +0100
> taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich Bayırlı/Kammer) wrote:
>
>> From 6201470b3e6c2410be7f38d8cc1cc99c3b13f0da Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: =?UTF-8?q?Taylan=20Ulrich=20Bay=C4=B1rl=C4=B1/Kammer?=
>> <taylanbayi...@gmail.com>
>> Date: Thu, 12 Feb 2015 22:19:52 +0100
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: Add CLISP.
I agree with all of Eric's feedback, with one exception:
>> + (description "GNU CLISP is an implementation of ANSI Common
>> Lisp, with +many extensions. It includes an interpreter, compiler,
> ^
> "+many" -> "many"
[...]
> Copy and paste + wrapping errors? ;)
This seems to be a problem on your end, Eric. I guess that your mail
client word-wrapped Taylan's patch. The '+'s you see intermixed were at
the beginning of each line of the patch, of course.
>> + ;; Website says gpl2+, COPYRIGHT file says gpl2; actual source
>> files have
>> + ;; a lot of gpl3+. (Also some parts are under non-copyleft
>> licenses, such
>> + ;; as CLX by Texas Instruments.)
>> + (license (list license:gpl2 license:gpl2+ license:gpl3+))))
>
> I think in this case the gpl3+ might "win out", but I'll let others
> comment on that.
Yes, I think that's correct.
Okay to push with these changes.
Thanks!
Mark
PS: It might now be possible to bootstrap sbcl from source code using
either clisp or ecl. Any takers?
