Ricardo Wurmus <ricardo.wur...@mdc-berlin.de> skribis: > Ludovic Courtès writes: >>> + (license license:gpl3))) >> >> GPLv3-only? > > Actually, searching the source tree shows me that LICENSE includes the > "or (at your option) any later version" phrase; but the included copy of > htslib that is built as part of the STAR aligner is MIT licensed. > > I'll update the license field to > > ;; STAR is licensed under GPLv3 or later; htslib is MIT-licensed. > (license (list license:gpl3+ license:expat)) > > Is this appropriate?
Since the combined work is GPLv3+ anyway, I would keep the comment but set the ‘license’ field to GPL3+. Thanks, Ludo’.
