taylanbayi...@gmail.com (Taylan Ulrich "Bayırlı/Kammer") writes:
> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> writes: > >> Debian claims that the license is gpl2, not gpl2+. >> >> Please be more careful checking licenses. Debian tends to be very >> thorough about this, so a good method is to find the package on Debian, >> e.g. <http://packages.debian.org/smartmontools>, select the appropriate >> package (preferably the same version or close to it) and then choose the >> "Copyright File" link in the right column. > > OK, thanks for the tip. However, both the README and individual source > files use the "or (at your option) any later version" phrasing. I > wonder why Debian marked it gpl2? Indeed, you are right, and Debian is wrong. Nevermind :) One more unrelated suggestion, while I'm at it: in the synopsis and description, I think it would be better to write "S.M.A.R.T." rather than "SMART". What do you think? Anyway, okay to push. Thanks! Mark
