Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
>> diff --git a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
>> index a7156bf..dd33a26 100644
>> --- a/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
>> +++ b/gnu/packages/gcc.scm
>> @@ -213,7 +213,7 @@ where the OS part is overloaded to denote a specific
>> ABI---into GCC
>> ;; below, make sure to update the relevant code in
>> ;; %gcc-static package as needed.
>> (format #f "#define GNU_USER_TARGET_LIB_SPEC \
>> -\"-L~a/lib %{!static:-rpath=~a/lib %{!static-libgcc:-rpath=~a/lib64
>> -rpath=~a/lib -lgcc_s}} \" ~a"
>> +\"-L~a/lib %{!static:-rpath=~a/lib %{!static-libgcc:-rpath=~a/lib64
>> -rpath=~a/lib %{pthread: -lgcc_s}}} \" ~a"
>> libc libc libdir libdir suffix))
>> (("#define GNU_USER_TARGET_STARTFILE_SPEC.*$" line)
>> (format #f "#define STANDARD_STARTFILE_PREFIX_1
>> \"~a/lib\"
>>
>> I believe this is enough to address what the comment mentions (glibc
>> dlopening libgcc_s for pthread functions), but this will need testing.
I see you applied this patch. However, after grepping through libc, I
found there are other cases where libgcc_s is dlopened, including to
walk the stack, which has nothing to do with pthread.
So I think the status quo is safer.
WDYT?
Ludo’, who hopes gnu.org will be back soon.
