On 11/26/2014 09:30 AM, Federico Beffa wrote: > On Wed, Nov 26, 2014 at 4:46 AM, Eric Bavier <ericbav...@gmail.com> wrote: >> >> >> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Eric Bavier <ericbav...@gmail.com> wrote: >>> >>> >>> On Sat, Nov 22, 2014 at 9:40 AM, Federico Beffa <be...@ieee.org> wrote: >>>> >>>>> Eric Bavier <ericbav...@gmail.com> skribis: >>>>> >>>>>> * gnu/packages/gtk.scm (python2-pygtk): New variable. >>>>> >>>> >>>> I notice that most python packages are defined for python 3 and then a >>>> python2 package is generated with the procedure 'package-with-python2'. >>>> Is pygtk problematic with python 3? >>> >>> >>> It has been a while since I did the packaging work for this python2-pygtk, >>> and I seem to recall that there was some sort of difficulty with python3. >> >> >> It looks possible, but from what I can tell, it might require more work on >> the packages that pygtk depends on, some of which aren't compatible with >> python3 or would requires updates to work with python3. >> > > I noticed that pygtk depends on pycairo and the home page of the > latter provides two sources: one for python3 and one for python2. > Maybe that's the package causing some troubles. > > http://cairographics.org/pycairo/ >
Are the Python bindings currently built by the "cairo" package? If so, which version is used? Andreas, do you know this? Cyril.
