On Wed, Nov 05, 2014 at 06:38:12PM -0500, Felipe López wrote: > As for the frame, GRUB 2 is supposed to be more flexible about the > appearance of the elements in the screen. The frame can be removed and > the boot options can be graphically enhanced. However, I'm using GRUB > legacy appearance because, as far as I know, the theming features of > GRUB 2 are still in development and may not be stable. I've seen that > other distros use the GRUB 2 default appearance, which is the same as > GRUB legacy.
Okay, I agree it is more important to be stable than to get the last bit of visual pleasure. > Is the current gray difficult to read? If not, I'd prefer to leave it > that way. For me it is okay, but I would argue that the more contrast, the better! Andreas
