On Tue, Oct 28, 2014 at 10:34:48AM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > Ah right. And what if you again remove Python from ‘inputs’, and add > #:python ,python > to the arguments? > That means it will use the actual Python 3.x package, not the wrapper, > so everything will be visible. The downside is that there will be no > ‘python’ command, only ‘python3’. > > Perhaps the right fix will be to change ‘python-wrapper’ to symlink the > ‘lib’ sub-directory of ‘python’.
As already stated, I think we should add python as a propagated input to python-wrapper. The symlinks are just needed between the differently named python and python3. Should we give this a try? Andreas
