Ludovic Courtès (2014-10-28 11:08 +0300) wrote: > Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> The license for the Liberation fonts. I named it ‘silofl1.1’ or should >> it be just ‘silofl’? > > ‘silofl1.1’ sounds good. > >> Also about the title: "SIL Open Font License 1.1" or "SILOFL 1.1" or >> something else? > > Maybe “SIL OFL 1.1”? Most license objects use the abbreviation in the > ‘name’ field already, so that’d be consistent with those. :-)
Thanks, I'll change it. OK to push after that? (I hope it wouldn't conflict with anything this time :-))
