Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis: > l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > >> Eric Bavier <ericbav...@gmail.com> skribis: >> >>> From 88a4cc3aa53c73186b5dbb85bf03b2138f24c825 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 >>> From: Eric Bavier <bav...@member.fsf.org> >>> Date: Fri, 10 Oct 2014 13:07:55 -0500 >>> Subject: [PATCH 2/4] gnu: libjpeg: Upgrade to version 9a. >>> >>> * gnu/packages/image.scm (libjpeg): Upgrade to version 9a. >> >> OK. > > This triggered over 450 rebuilds. I wonder if it should have been done > in core-updates instead.
Arf, probably yes, in a ‘libjpeg-update’ branch, rather. What about having a policy for that? Like, above some threshold of the number of rebuilds reported by ‘guix refresh -l’ (200 packages?), set up a separate branch and Hydra job set. In an ideal world a patch queue manager would automatically take care of that. Ludo’.
