David Thompson writes:
> * gnu/packages/python.scm (python-pycrypto, python2-pycrypto): New variables.
> ---
> gnu/packages/python.scm | 32 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 32 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/gnu/packages/python.scm b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> index 2e16838..886dc03 100644
> --- a/gnu/packages/python.scm
> +++ b/gnu/packages/python.scm
> @@ -1598,3 +1598,35 @@ somewhat intelligeble.")
> (define-public python2-pyjwt
> (package-with-python2 python-pyjwt))
>
> +(define-public python-pycrypto
As I pointed out on IRC, this package is redundant with the one added in
cafc3f5a.
> + (inputs
> + `(("python" ,python) ;; need libpython3.3m
> + ("python-setuptools" ,python-setuptools)
> + ("gmp" ,gmp)))
Should python-setuptools perhaps go in native-inputs (this question
applies to the other patches sent in this batch as well)? Not all of
the existing python packages follow this, but maybe they should.
Someone more practiced with cross-compilation might know better.
--
Eric Bavier
