Ludovic Courtès (2014-09-05 12:26 +0400) wrote:
> Alex Kost <alez...@gmail.com> skribis:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I would like to know people's opinions about default key bindings.
>>
>> Currently in a buffer with a list of packages we have: "u"/"U" to
>> unmark/unmark all. But it leaves no room for marking for upgrade and I
>> just bound it to "^" which is not very good.
>>
>> So what about combining "unmark"/"unmark all" into one key and use
>> either:
>>
>> 1. "U" - unmark ("C-u U" - unmark all);
>> "u" - mark for upgrading.
>>
>> 2. "u" - unmark ("C-u u" - unmark all);
>> "U" - mark for upgrade. Should it also require (for consistency) to
>> use upper-case "I"/"D" for marking for installing/deletion?
>
> I’m hesitant, but I would vote for #2. I don’t think I and D are needed
> though.
I prefer this variant as well: "u" is a too common binding for unmarking
in Emacs (it is used in dired, buffer-menu, ibuffer, package-menu, ...).
So unmarking should probably stay on "u" (and unmark all with prefix).
>> Also should there be a command to mark all obsolete packages for
>> upgrading? If so, what key should it be bound to? (perhaps my favourite
>> "^").
>
> Actually this is what U does in package.el. But I’m fine with ^ here.
Taylan suggested "C-u U" for this one. And I think it would be perfect,
but...
Let's say a user has both "foo-1.0:out" and "foo-1.0:doc" installed and
one day they become obsolete. He decides to upgrade only "out" for some
reason. May there exist such a situation?
If so, then I think "C-u U" should be used to specify a particular
output for upgrading. Actually I implemented such specifying of outputs
for installing and deletion ("i"/"d") but not for upgrading (I don't
remember why).
--
Alex
