Nikita Karetnikov <nik...@karetnikov.org> skribis: >>> Is there a function that accepts a package name and returns a list of >>> implicit inputs? > >> No, because by definition, those “implicit inputs” are not listed in the >> package object. Instead, they are added by the build system (see >> build-system/gnu.scm.) > >> That’s why I suggested using derivations instead: take the output of >> (package-derivation x y), and traverse it in search of fixed-output >> derivations. > > What’s a fixed-ouput derivation?
A derivation whose result (hash thereof) is known in advance, as is the case for downloads (info "(guix) Derivations"). Ludo’.
