On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > OK, I believe this is fixed with 89faa5c.
Indeed, it is working now. Thanks! Andreas
On Thu, Mar 20, 2014 at 11:07:34PM +0100, Ludovic Courtès wrote: > OK, I believe this is fixed with 89faa5c.
Indeed, it is working now. Thanks! Andreas