l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes:
> Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org> skribis:
>
>> From bb44edacf768c8308f7d64ad16a10ca9c924469d Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
>> From: Mark H Weaver <m...@netris.org>
>> Date: Sun, 16 Feb 2014 16:38:00 -0500
>> Subject: [PATCH] gnu: icu4c: Upgrade to 52.1.
>>
>> * gnu/packages/icu4c.scm (icu4c): Upgrade to 52.1.
>
> OK to push, but rather on ‘core-updates’ to limit rebuilds, as discussed
> yesterday.
FWIW, the 'patchelf' fix will trigger a rebuild of icu4c anyway. So it
would cause no additional work if these two commits were simultaneously
pushed to 'master'.
Alternatively, they could both be pushed to core-updates only. I need
the 'patchelf' fix now, but I can keep that on my local branch off
master, I suppose.
What do you think?
Mark
