Kete <k...@ninthfloor.org> skribis: > On Saturday, January 04, 2014 12:47:06 PM Ludovic Courtès wrote: >> I’d recommend looking at how that tcsetpgrp check is implemented, to see >> what makes it think it doesn’t work. In particular what does >> ‘config.log’ report about this test? > > I didn't find any mention.
Hmm, that’s surprising. Normally config.log contains details about failed configure tests. >> The ‘license’ field should reflect the license of what gets installed. >> So if build-time scripts are GPL, that doesn’t matter here. But please >> do skim over the license headers to make sure they’re all under that >> X11-style license. > > Here is what I found with grep: > Completion/Unix/Command/_darcs is licensed under the GNU GPL. "zsh > will be linked against libgdbm. This means the binary is covered by > the GNU General Public License. This does not affect the source > code." config.guess and config.sub are also GPLed. Does it comes with a copy of GDBM? Or is it an optional dependency? If the latter, then I guess you should add that dependency. > The rest default to that X11-style license. So you should keep that ‘x11-style’ license, with a comment above saying that, since it’s linked against GDBM, it’s GPLv3+ in practice. If it builds fine, feel free to post a patch as produced by ‘git format-patch’ (please read “Submitting Patches” in ‘HACKING’.) Thanks, Ludo’.
