Nikita Karetnikov <nik...@karetnikov.org> skribis: >> Yes, please! > > Done. By the way, thanks for showing the head of the file, it’s really > helpful.
Thanks. >> (Make sure ‘make sync-descriptions’ doesn’t complain.) > > There are other packages that complain. I’m willing to help with this. That’s because Karl has started reviewing the descriptions (“blurbs”). The file has also been renamed:
diff --git a/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm b/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm index 1b767f3..3dd8874 100644 --- a/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm +++ b/guix/gnu-maintenance.scm @@ -86,7 +86,7 @@ ;; This file contains package descriptions in recutils format. ;; See <https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/guix-devel/2013-10/msg00071.html>. (string->uri - (string-append %gnumaint-base-url "pkgdescr.txt?root=womb"))) + (string-append %gnumaint-base-url "pkgblurbs.txt?root=womb"))) (define-record-type* <gnu-package-descriptor> gnu-package-descriptor
Maybe we should just wait a few more days for things to settle before synchronizing again. > Which should be updated in ‘core-updates’? Will it be enough to run > ‘guix build coreutils -n‘ (as suggested here [1]) to check? Not even necessary: changing descriptions doesn’t affect the hash, so all that can be done in ‘master’. Ludo’.
