> Ah, and I though that syntax-rules was always written in term of > syntax-case. I see. Thank you!
Yeah, it most most often is these days, but historically, syntax-rules was
invented before syntax-case. IIRC, the choice to include syntax-case in R6RS
was controversial because syntax-rules was expressed in terms of different
low-level abstractions in some Scheme implementations ("explicit substitutions"
or something like that).
