>Onderwerp: Getting all symbols in a Scheme file as a list
The following will give you a list of all the symbols (unless I made some
syntax errors) (also replace ‘ by a proper quote, e-mail program is corrupting
it):
(use-modules (ice-9 match))
(define (all-symbols s-exp)
(match s-exp
((? symbol? a) (list a))
((a . b) (append (all-symbols a) (all-symbols b)))
;; insert rules for vectors and arrays
[…]
(_ ‘())))
[ also open file with open-input-file, apply ‘read’ to the port and pass the
result to all-symbols, in a loop, and append the results together. ].
Doesn’t seem useful for what you are mentioning later, though …
>I'm trying to write a Guile script to trace symbol definition and reference
between modules in a large Guile repo (GNU/Guix), for the purposes of large
scale refactoring.
There is no such thing as symbol definitions in Scheme – you can make symbols
with symbol->string, but you can’t define a symbol to anything, symbols simply
are.
You can, however, define variables, which have a symbol as name (and that name
may depend on context in case of hygienic macros or renamed imports/exports in
modules).
>I'm wondering how I could programmatically get all the values in a
Scheme file
as an S-expression. From the manual, I know that the REPL has meta keyword
',binding' and ',apropos'
<https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/guile.html#index-apropos>
which let
you search and list all bindings in accessible to a module. These are
exactly
what I need only, since they're meta-commands, they don't produce Scheme
expressions.
>Does anyone have any pointers? Should I go down the route of,
> (open-input-pipe (string-append "guile -l" file "-c ,binding"))
>? Seems a little bit baroque to me, I'd expect a simpler way of doing
it. Any
libraries anyone knows of?
No. The quoting is incorrect when file has spaces, \, …, guile in PATH might
not be the Guile that is being run, … (For the former, consider
open-input-pipe*.)
You can probably find a simpler way of doing it by locating where “,binding” is
implemented (in the Guile source code). It probably uses the module reflection
API. This API is documented in
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Module-System-Reflection.html
However, the documentation is incomplete – IIRC there is a procedure
‘module-bindings’ to find a list of top-level definitions, but it doesn’t seem
to be documented.
To find what modules a module uses, there is module-uses, though I doubt it is
reliable w.r.t. optimisation, inlining, uses of (@ (module name) variable), …
So, instead, I would propose to instead work on the Tree-IL level
(https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/Tree_002dIL.html). In
particular, see <toplevel-define> for definitions and
<module-ref>,<module-set!> for uses of other modules.
This also allows for more fine-grained information – e.g. these <module-ref>
etc. objects contain the location in the source code, and if a <module-ref> is
inside a <toplevel-define> then you know that it is the procedure (assuming it
is a procedure) of the <toplevel-define> that uses the variable of the
<module-ref>.
(See
https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/The-Scheme-Compiler.html
for how to compile stuff – also, IIRC, the compilation procedure accepts ports
instead of only S-expressions, despite what the example suggests.)
Best regards,
Maxime Devos
