$ sudo apt-get install guile-3.0
bianchi fabrizio
Il giorno gio 2 feb 2023 alle ore 17:35 Fabrizio Bianchi <
fabriziobianch...@gmail.com> ha scritto:
> salve. Ho letto il vostro messaggio.
> Purtroppo non capisco quale sia il problema.
> Provi a sentire la community. Ho installato dal sito FSF.org il guile 3.0.9
> bianchi fabrizio
>
>
> Il giorno gio 2 feb 2023 alle ore 17:13 Wolf <w...@wolfsden.cz> ha
> scritto:
>
>> Hello,
>>
>> I'm having a problem of getting borderline useless stack traces from a
>> script
>> executed via a shebang. For example, let's consider following script:
>>
>> $ cat /tmp/x.scm
>> #!/bin/sh
>> exec guile --no-auto-compile -e main -s "$0" "$@"
>> !#
>>
>> (define (main args)
>> (foo))
>>
>> (define (foo)
>> (bar))
>>
>> (define (bar)
>> (error "x"))
>>
>> When I execute it directly, the error message is not great:
>>
>> $ /tmp/x.scm
>> Backtrace:
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>> 1752:10 4 (with-exception-handler _ _ #:unwind? _
>> #:unwind-for-type _)
>> In unknown file:
>> 3 (apply-smob/0 #<thunk 7fdb1e7a2340>)
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>> 724:2 2 (call-with-prompt ("prompt") #<procedure 7fdb1e7b2c80 at
>> ice-9/eval.scm:330:13 ()> #<procedure default-prompt-handler (k proc)>)
>> In ice-9/eval.scm:
>> 619:8 1 (_ #(#(#<directory (guile-user) 7fdb1e7a5c80>)))
>> In ice-9/boot-9.scm:
>> 2007:7 0 (error _ . _)
>>
>> ice-9/boot-9.scm:2007:7: In procedure error:
>> x
>>
>> The /tmp/x.scm file is not even mentioned once in the output. Can this be
>> somehow (command line arguments, changing the exec line, ...) improved?
>> Currently it's not very useful when I need to find out what the problem
>> was.
>>
>> Thank you,
>> W.
>>
>> --
>> There are only two hard things in Computer Science:
>> cache invalidation, naming things and off-by-one errors.
>>
>
