Maxime Devos <maximede...@telenet.be> writes: > Jean Abou Samra schreef op wo 09-03-2022 om 00:31 [+0100]: >> In summary, the less Guile optimizes, the faster LilyPond runs. Is that >> something expected? > > I don't think so, but I don't have a clue how this happens ...
Do I understand it correctly that Lilypond has lots of snippets that are executed exactly once? In that case it could be expected that the overhead of optimization dominates — maybe even the overhead of increased code-size from inlining? Also the new baseline compiler is already pretty good: https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/06/03/a-baseline-compiler-for-guile Maybe this? > There is also a felicitous feedback effect in that because the > baseline compiler is much smaller than the CPS compiler, it takes less > time to macro-expand — > https://wingolog.org/archives/2020/06/03/a-baseline-compiler-for-guile Best wishes, Arne -- Unpolitisch sein heißt politisch sein, ohne es zu merken. draketo.de
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
