Hi Christine, Christine Lemmer-Webber <cweb...@dustycloud.org> writes:
> Heck, maybe I should make a SRFI for common human readable SRFI names. > #mildlyspicytake #maybenotabadidea It looks to be about as spicy as a cucumber. :) I remembered that the R7RS Large process was giving library names to SRFIs, but it looks like many of them now have a “library name” field in their metadata. For instance, see <https://srfi.schemers.org/srfi-2/>, which says “library name: and-let*”. Unfortunately, there are conflicts (for example, 43 and 133 are both called “vectors”), so we might not be able to take their names whole cloth. Having many libraries named with a number is annoying to experienced users and beginners alike. Let’s fix it! (I liked the rest of your message too, but the SRFI names really stand out as something to be fixed IMO.) -- Tim
