Hi Taylan! Hm. I see.
I am not quite sure I understand the implications of this. Am I still safe, if I rely on procedure-minimum-arity, or is that just asking for my code to break at a later point in time? Regards, Zelphir On 5/27/21 12:23 PM, Taylan Kammer wrote: > On 26.05.2021 21:33, Zelphir Kaltstahl wrote: >> Is that a bug, or is it, because I am trying to use it in the REPL and there >> my >> procedure is not compiled? >> >> Best regards, >> Zelphir >> > There's a relevant bug report I looked into recently: > > https://bugs.gnu.org/40294 > > Quoting myself: > > It seems that commit 1c33be992e8120abd20add8021e4d91d226f5b6a removed > much of the programs API at the C level but forgot to make the changes > to the corresponding Scheme module. (It was a big commit, part of > changing the whole VM implementation.) > -- repositories: https://notabug.org/ZelphirKaltstahl
