I suppose that I could use something like "scm_wrong_type_arg_msg" ...
which gives better looking feedback than "#f":
scheme@(guile-user)> (random:lognormal 0 -1)
ice-9/boot-9.scm:1669:16: In procedure raise-exception:
In procedure random:lognormal: Wrong type argument in position 2 (expecting
standard deviation): -1
On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 3:58 PM Tim Meehan <btmee...@gmail.com> wrote:
> Hello Olivier, thanks!
> Those functions helped, and now I know where in the source of Guile to
> look.
>
> Is "inexact" the same thing as "floating point number" in Guile-speak?
>
> Here is one of the functions in my extension - it returns a lognormal
> variate. There are a bunch of things like this that could be added to
> "random.c" - but I'm imagining that the only user of stuff like that might
> be ... me ... anyhow:
>
> Right now, it doesn't give really helpful errors when you give it a
> negative standard deviation:
> scheme@(guile-user)> (random:lognormal 0 -1)
> $1 = #f
>
> SCM_DEFINE (scm_random_lognormal, "random:lognormal", 2, 1, 0,
> (SCM _mu, SCM _sigma, SCM state),
> "Return an inexact real in a Log Normal distribution.\n"
> "\n"
> "@var{mu} - mean of the underlying normal distribution.\n"
> "@var{sigma} - standard deviation of the same.\n"
> "Optionally, a random @var{state} can be provided.\n"
> "See @code{seed->random-state}.")
> #define FUNC_NAME s_scm_random_lognormal
> {
> if (SCM_UNBNDP (state))
> state = SCM_VARIABLE_REF (scm_var_random_state);
> SCM_VALIDATE_RSTATE (1, state);
>
> if (scm_is_false (scm_positive_p (_sigma)))
> return SCM_BOOL_F; // I'd like to return some meaningful error here ...
>
> double mu = scm_to_double (_mu);
> double sigma = scm_to_double (_sigma);
> return scm_from_double (exp (mu + sigma*scm_c_normal01
> (SCM_RSTATE(state))));
> }
> #undef FUNC_NAME
>
> On Sun, Feb 21, 2021 at 9:59 AM Olivier Dion <olivier.d...@polymtl.ca>
> wrote:
>
>> On Sat, 20 Feb 2021, Tim Meehan <btmee...@gmail.com> wrote:
>> > I'm trying my hand a writing C extensions.
>> > I've done this for stuff like Matlab before, and was wondering how you
>> do
>> > the usual checking of the arguments that are passed in from Guile.
>> >
>> > In the manual, 6.13.13.1 "C Support" has a few functions.
>> > libguile/numbers.h has a bunch more ...
>> >
>> > What I have is an extension function, sort of like the bessel function
>> in
>> > the tutorial:
>> >
>> https://www.gnu.org/software/guile/manual/html_node/A-Sample-Guile-Extension.html
>>
>> Usually I do this in 2 or 3 steps.
>>
>> 1. Define the primitive in C with raw arguments.
>>
>> 2. Make a wrapper of this primitive for Guile to use. Optionnaly do
>> the arguments checking here or go to step 3.
>>
>> 3. Make a second wrapper in Scheme and check the arguments there.
>> This wrapper will call wrapper in made in 2.
>>
>> Here's a full example:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> float c_sin(double x)
>> {
>> return sin(x);
>> }
>>
>> SCM_DEFINE(c_sin_wrapper, "sin", 1, 0, 0,
>> (SCM x),
>> "My sine")
>> {
>> if (scm_is_number(x)) {
>> return c_sin(scm_to_double(x));
>> }
>>
>> return SCM_BOOL_F;
>> }
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > What I would like to do is verify that the first argument is an inexact
>> > number, larger than 0. How would I go about that? Perhaps some of it
>> > could
>>
>> For your example, use the following predicates:
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>> scm_is_inexact(x) && scm_is_true(scm_positive_p(x))
>> ----------------------------------------------------------------------
>>
>> > be:
>> > SCM_REALP
>> > scm_misc_error
>> >
>> > Any tips?
>> --
>> Olivier Dion
>> PolyMtl
>>
>
