> On 28 Nov 2017, at 00:05, Stefan Israelsson Tampe <stefan.ita...@gmail.com> 
> wrote:
> 
> There are lists of free memory kept in each thread so usually small 
> allocation is one multithreaded large allocation and then
> a bunch of small allocation in thread consuming that large allocation. So for 
> small memory segments I would say that the 
> overhead probably is neglible.

I saw overhead also for the small allocations, 20-30% maybe. This is in a 
program that makes a lot of allocations relative other computations. So that 
made me wonder about Guile.



Reply via email to