l...@gnu.org (Ludovic Courtès) writes: > Hello! > > Did you mean to email guile-user@gnu.org? > Yes!
> Alex Vong <alexvong1...@gmail.com> skribis: > >> When trying to write some C binding to flex using libguile-2.0, I notice > > FWIW, I’d suggest using something like Danny Dubé’s SILex instead of > writing bindings to Flex. > Where should I get SILex? The version used by Chicken Scheme seems to be written on 1997, which is quite old, while the author's homepage is gone. >> Besides, when reading >> <https://libreplanet.org/wiki/Group:Guix/GSoC-2016>, >> I notice librejs flags the scipts as non-free, such as, >> <https://libreplanet.org/w/load.php?debug=false&lang=en&modules=startup&only=scripts&skin=vector&*>. >> Is this a known issue? > > No, probably worth reporting the the web site admins? > I emailed libreplanet-...@libreplanet.org about the issue. >> Finally, how should I get the running procedure? >> Currently, I am using the following code: >> >> (define my-proc-name >> (lambda _ >> (frame-procedure (stack-ref (make-stack #t) 1)))) >> >> (my-proc-name) >> ==> #<procedure my-proc-name _> >> >> Is there better way to achieve this? Can continuation be used to >> implement this? My guess is no, since you can only get "the next thing >> to do" but not "the current thing you are doing". Am I right? > > Right. However, note that the above may not always work especially on > Guile 2.1/2.2. > OK. >> Off-topic >> ========= >> Also, I think I am interested in being a GSOC student. The project ideas >> look tough though! Also, I need a new laptop, the '9' and '0' key >> sometimes doesn't work. I guess it is because I am typing too much '(' >> and ')'. > > :-) > > Ludo’.
