On Sat, 2015-06-06 at 10:19 -0700, Matt Wette wrote:
> On Jun 4, 2015, at 1:41 AM, Nala Ginrut <nalagin...@gmail.com> wrote:
> >
> >> 1) There is no specification of terminals. Terminals are detected in
> >> rules (via fenders) as quoted symbols or characters.
> >> Example of terminals: 'number, #\+
> >
> > hmm...and strings? Do you have plan to let users choose whether to use
> > terminals-inference? ;-)
>
> This I will think about. It should not be difficult. (I'm wondering what
> to do with strings like "(hello)" that I might want to convert to symbols.)
IIRC, this is implementation specific, say, #{\x28;hello\x29;}#
You can get it from string->symbol. And #{...}# notation is Guile
specific.
But you don't have to worry about the portability, since you may use
cond-expand.
Best regards.
